Screen Resolution – 4:3 vs 16:9

In his new Alertbox Jakob Nielsen talks about his new findings about screen resolution and imporved productivity when using big screens. His recommendation is to use a basic layout optimized for 1024×768 and make it liquid so it will adopt 800×600 or 1280×1024. The most important thing in his alertbox for me was that there is a

need for a new paradigm in the future

.

The reason behind that is not only the screens getting bigger and bigger. There is another trend in screen resolution going on for a while that hardly gets noticed. Many screens do not fit onto the 4:3 layout of applications and web sites anymore. Since many laptops have been optimized for DVD playback or Apple sells the cinema displays designers have to think about different layouts even more – how to build for 16:9.

Offline we still use the portrait format for writing and sharing information. We have books in that format, newspapers and the plain paper are sold in portrait. On the screen we have been used to a landscape format. Since the early beginning of TV we have been accustomed to that format and now this goes on with computers. A few years ago first cinemas and then home TV moved to 16:9 format instead of using 4:3. That was because our eye’s viewing area is landscape instead of portrait and wider than high.

So how do we handle this situation? We have to accept that we no longer have controll over the screen size. Sure, we may write applications and design web sites that share the least common deliminator. But would you really like to have a web site 800×600? That’s where Jakob Nielson’s suggestion comes in place – make liquid layouts that will adopt to a lot of different sizes and proportions. You may not get every case but it should be able to be viewed in at least 5 to 6 different orientations and sizes.

Soccer World Cup final: Zidane – it’s over…

Something really interesting happend this night. No – not Italy’s win of the Soccer World Cup. I thought more of how Zinedine Zidane left the world of soccer. Sure, there will be many people who will critizise him for what he did and it was a very unsportive action. Still most people will not understand what may have forced him to do. But I do, because I did the same.

I played soccer for almost 13 years at a small soccer club. For the last 6 years I was a goal keeper. During all those years I shot 4 goals, and got less than 4 yellow cards. In my last game, which was also the final of a small cup, we lost because I left the field about 15 minutes earlier. How could that happend as a goal keeper – I got red… For almost the same reason than Zidane. It was because I was so angry about something that I just went cracy and didn’t think about the outcome. Honestly, I was even happy to leave the field…

This is a hard way to see somebody like that leave the soccer world and it really makes me sad to see him in that situation. My advantage was that the cup wasn’t that big, loosing in the World Cup final is something entirely different. I hope for him that he can forget that moment and think of what he did over the years before. He was and still is one of the greatest players ever on earth.

Good bye Zinedine.

New life

So now I am in Franfurt and left my old life in Munich behind. Starting a new career in a new city with new people. Sound exicting – it is, and also frightening. But new starts are never easy and sometimes this just gives you also a new view of your life…