<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>design it simple - sense &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designitsimple.de/category/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designitsimple.de</link>
	<description>if it doesn&#039;t make sense it doesn&#039;t make cents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First 2 Words in Subject Lines</title>
		<link>http://www.designitsimple.de/2009/04/first-2-words-in-subject-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designitsimple.de/2009/04/first-2-words-in-subject-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tipps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designitsimple.de/wordpress/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Jakob Nielsen posted an article about the first 2 words in a link on webpages. His researched showed that many people can guess the content of good links within 11 characters. While that doesn&#8217;t mean that we should now &#8230; <a href="http://www.designitsimple.de/2009/04/first-2-words-in-subject-lines/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Jakob Nielsen posted an <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/nanocontent.html">article about the first 2 words in a link</a> on webpages. His researched showed that many people can guess the content of good links within 11 characters. While that doesn&#8217;t mean that we should now limit all links to that length, I think there is a good hint in the results. Make most of what is important understandable quickly.</p>
<p>From reading many articles about e-mail usability lately I think these results can also give good tipps for e-mail subject lines. If you want people to understand your e-mail in an overview list quickly, create subject lines that can communicate the meaning in a quick way. You can still add additional info in the subject line, but have the first words explain the important part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designitsimple.de/2009/04/first-2-words-in-subject-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delete your account on wordpress.com, and maybe other web2.0 apps</title>
		<link>http://www.designitsimple.de/2007/04/delete-your-account-on-wordpresscom-and-maybe-other-web20-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designitsimple.de/2007/04/delete-your-account-on-wordpresscom-and-maybe-other-web20-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designitsimple.de/wordpress/2007/04/delete-your-account-on-wordpresscom-and-maybe-other-web20-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last months and even years I have registered with a lot of sites. Most of them I just try to check out because they are pretty new and are apps that seem to be worth using. However, I &#8230; <a href="http://www.designitsimple.de/2007/04/delete-your-account-on-wordpresscom-and-maybe-other-web20-apps/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last months and even years I have registered with a lot of sites. Most of them I just try to check out because they are pretty new and are apps that seem to be worth using. However, I assume 90% of sites I register with I don&#8217;t use more than 2 &#8211; 3 times. Then I would really like to delete my account. Most of the time it&#8217;s hard to find how to delete your account, but sometimes it&#8217;s just impossible.</p>
<p>Today I wanted to delete my wordpress.com account. Why? I just don&#8217;t use it. I searched for a way and found a faq-page which told me something I just couldn&#8217;t understand.<br />
<img src="http://www.designitsimple.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/Bild%202.png" alt="Can't delete wordpress.com account" /><br />
Why would the software or database crash if an account is deleted? If you write your app code properly that won&#8217;t ever happen.</p>
<p>This question is a very important question, especially if someone thinks about OpenID. Can I unregister from a webpage. What happens to my data? Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designitsimple.de/2007/04/delete-your-account-on-wordpresscom-and-maybe-other-web20-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Getting Real&#8221; online for free</title>
		<link>http://www.designitsimple.de/2006/10/getting-real-online-for-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designitsimple.de/2006/10/getting-real-online-for-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designitsimple.de/wordpress/2006/10/getting-real-online-for-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the best books I read this year is free for everybody now. It&#8217;s 37signals &#8220;Getting Real&#8221;. After reading their weblog for more than 3 years now, using almost all of their products (except Ta-Da lists) I have become &#8230; <a href="http://www.designitsimple.de/2006/10/getting-real-online-for-free/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best books I read this year is <a href="http://gettingreal.37signals.com/">free for everybody</a> now. It&#8217;s 37signals &#8220;Getting Real&#8221;. After reading their weblog for more than 3 years now, using almost all of their products (except Ta-Da lists) I have become a big fan of theirs.</p>
<p>The insights and opinions in their book are amazing, groundbreaking and helpful. I have been struggling with same problems when programming and after using some of their techniques it makes a lot more fun.</p>
<p>But be aware, after reading this book you might get big problems with the old-habbit people that don&#8217;t want to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designitsimple.de/2006/10/getting-real-online-for-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes vs Media Player</title>
		<link>http://www.designitsimple.de/2005/02/itunes-vs-media-player/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designitsimple.de/2005/02/itunes-vs-media-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designitsimple.de/wordpress/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody has learned to use a stereo with these symbols: &#62; , &#171; , &#187;, [] (stop/pause). Even children could understand that scheme very fast. So, when you use a computer now to listen to music, what would you do?iTunes: &#8230; <a href="http://www.designitsimple.de/2005/02/itunes-vs-media-player/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">Everybody has learned to use a stereo with these symbols:<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold">&gt; , &laquo; , &raquo;, []</span> (stop/pause). Even children could understand that scheme very fast. So, when you use a computer now to listen to music, what would you do?<span style="font-weight: bold"><a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/">iTunes</a>:</span> Apple chose to use those keys that would come to mind very easily. <span style="font-weight: bold">Right arrow, left arrow</span>, for skipping to the next or the previous track. <span style="font-weight: bold">Changing the volume</span> of the music, you use <span style="font-weight: bold">arrow up</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold">down</span>. If you want to play or pause you hit the space. Everthing is very easy.<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/default.aspx"><br />
</a><span style="font-weight: bold"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/default.aspx">Windows Media Player</a>:</span> <span style="font-weight: bold">Ctrl + P</span> for <span style="font-weight: bold">play</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold">Ctrl + F</span> for <span style="font-weight: bold">next</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold">Ctrl + B</span> for <span style="font-weight: bold">previous</span> track. <span style="font-weight: bold">Volume </span>up is <span style="font-weight: bold">F10</span>, down is <span style="font-weight: bold">F9</span>. Nice way to learn where your keys are on the keyboard, but not very useful if you want to skip through the songs or have to change the volume. You always have to look where the key is.Why does Microsoft have to reinvent the wheel again. It would have been so easy to use Apples layout. This has the advantage that it is the same for each language, Microsoft has to change the key assignments for each country. Even in English it’s not very straigtforward. Instead of using the text label Forward for Ctrl &#8211; F they use Next (or Ctrl &#8211; N, to make it even better).</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designitsimple.de/2005/02/itunes-vs-media-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
